Authors

  1. Garbee, Deborah PhD, APRN, ACNS-BC
  2. Danna, Denise RN, DNS, NEA-BC, CNE, FACHE
  3. Lemoine, Colleen APRN, MN, AOCN, RN-BC

Abstract

Review question/objective: The objective is to examine the evidence on the impact of side effects on adherence and persistence with oral anticancer agents in women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. This review aims to answer the following question: What is the impact of side effects on adherence and persistence with oral anticancer agents in women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer?

 

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed in women both worldwide and in the United States.1-2 The International Agency for Research on Cancer1 estimated 1.67 million new cases of female breast cancer occurred in 2012 worldwide, accounting for 25% of all female cancers. The American Cancer Society2 estimates 232,670 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in the United States in 2014. Rates of breast cancer vary significantly across the world which is likely a function of true differences in incident rates, the absence of screening programs and limitations associated with the collection and reporting of cases.3 Based on available data, the lowest incidence of breast cancer reported is in Middle Africa and Eastern Asia and the highest incidence reported is in Western Europe. Since the mid-2000s, the incidence of breast cancer in the United States and the United Kingdom has been relatively stable;2,4 however, worldwide, there was a 20% increase in breast cancer incidence between 2008 and 2012.5 Bray et al.6 predict a global increase in breast cancer of two percent annually resulting in a projection of more than two million cases of female breast cancer diagnosed in 2030.

 

Breast cancer is also the leading cause of cancer deaths in females worldwide with an estimated 522,000 deaths globally in 2012.1 In the United States breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in females and is expected to cause 40,000 female deaths in 2014.2 Mortality from breast cancer in women range from a low of six per 100,000 in Eastern Asia to a high of 20 per 100,000 in Western Africa.1 Higher mortality rates in less developed countries may be due to lack of screening and early detection programs, and to limited access to trained providers, treatment facilities and effective therapies.5-7

 

Treatment for breast cancer is based on stage and other tumor characteristics, such as hormone-receptor status and HER2/neu receptor status. In addition to surgery and radiation, early stage breast cancer treatment can include adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and/or targeted therapy. The majority of adjuvant chemotherapy is administered intravenously; however, one agent, cyclophosphamide, is available in an oral formulation. Treatment with hormonal agents, which is accomplished almost exclusively through the use of oral agents, is the standard of care for women with hormone-receptor positive cancers, estimated to be 70-80% of all new breast cancer cases.8 At present, there are no oral targeted agents currently used to treat early stage breast cancer.

 

Oral anticancer agents are becoming increasingly more common in cancer treatment plans for both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. In the past decade, more than two dozen oral anticancer agents have received approval by the US FDA.9 At present there are over fifty oral anticancer agents commercially available in the US, 11 of which are indicated for the treatment of breast cancer, although many are currently indicated for use in the more advanced breast cancer setting. The number of oral anticancer agents is likely to continue to increase as an estimated 25% of agents currently being investigated for oncology are orally administered.10

 

Compared to parenteral anti-cancer therapies, oral agents offer potential advantages including patient convenience, an increased sense of control and freedom, decreased time spent traveling to, and at, the health care provider site receiving treatment, and no discomfort associated with intravenous access.11-14 Despite the potential advantages oral anticancer therapy offers, there are also associated challenges, primarily monitoring for and managing side effects, and adherence and persistence with the treatment regimen.10-11, 15 Common side effects associated with oral anticancer agents include night sweats, hot flashes, vaginal dryness, decreased libido, arthralgia, myalgia, nausea or weight gain. The World Health Organization16 defines adherence as 'the extent to which a person's behavior - taking medication, following a diet, and/or executing lifestyle changes, corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider.16(p.3) This definition highlights the active role the patient has in agreeing with the healthcare provider's recommendations rather than "passively acquiescing" with the healthcare provider's advice. A more narrow definition specific to medication adherence is "the extent to which a patient acts in accordance with the prescribed interval and dose of a dosing regimen".17(p.46)Persistence is the conforming to a recommendation of continuing treatment for the prescribed length of time and is defined as "the duration of time from initiation to discontinuation of therapy".17(p.46)

 

Adherence is important because clinical benefits associated with medications cannot be derived by patients who do not take the medication. Compromised clinical response, development of drug resistance, disease progression, increased toxicity and death are all negative consequences that can occur from sub-optimal adherence. Poor persistence is also associated with compromised efficacy.16,18-25 Given the serious nature of cancer, it may not seem that suboptimal adherence and persistence would be problematic; however, studies have reported adherence rates as low as 20% and early discontinuation rates ranging from 17%-31%.26-27

 

The World Health Organization16 proposes five interacting dimensions of adherence: the social and economic dimension, the health care system dimension, the condition-related dimension, the therapy-related dimension, and the patient-related dimension. Within the therapy-related dimension, actual or perceived negative side effects are noted to influence adherence. A number of early studies yielded conflicting results about the impact of side effects on adherence in oncology patients.15

 

The expected increase in breast cancer globally and the significant effect of suboptimal adherence and persistence on patient outcomes makes it essential to fully characterize the impact side effects have on adherence and persistence in order to develop effective interventions. Systematic reviews have been conducted on adherence and persistence to oral anticancer therapies in other cancer populations but none has focused exclusively on the early stage breast cancer population.28-30 In addition, early studies reported conflicting results regarding the impact of side effects on adherence and persistence. Therefore, the aim of this review is to use early and more current publications to more clearly elucidate the impact side effects have on adherence and persistence to oral anticancer agents in women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer.

 

Article Content

Inclusion criteria

Types of participants

The quantitative component of this review will consider studies that include females 18 years of age or older, diagnosed with early stage breast cancer (stage I - IIIA, comprised of breast cancers that are confined to the breast or the breast and axillary lymph nodes). Studies will be included regardless of race or nationality of participants.

 

Types of interventions

This review will consider studies that evaluate the impact of side effects of oral anticancer therapy in comparison to no side effects. Reported side effects vary based on anticancer therapy and individual patient responses and may include night sweats, hot flashes, vaginal dryness, decreased libido, arthralgia, myalgia, nausea or weight gain. Any side effect reported as impacting adherence and/or persistence or any side effect evaluated for its impact on adherence and/or persistence in published studies will be included. Side effects reported as present or absent, side effects reported by severity, and/or side effects quantified using instruments or criteria defined in the study will be included. All side effects will be included.

 

Types of outcomes

This review will consider studies that include the following outcome measures: adherence and/or persistence rates. Methods to measure adherence and persistence include patient diaries, patient self-report, pill counts, microelectronic monitoring systems and prescription refill rates.

 

Types of studies

The review will consider both experimental and epidemiological study designs including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, before and after studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case control studies and analytical cross sectional studies for inclusion.

 

The review will also consider descriptive epidemiological study designs including case series, individual case reports and descriptive cross sectional studies for inclusion.

 

Search strategy

The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy will be utilized in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe the article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles will be searched for additional studies. Studies published in English or available in English translation will be considered for inclusion in this review. Studies published from 1975 to April 2014 will be considered for inclusion in this review. Tamoxifen has been in use for more than 30 years and oral Cytoxan since the mid-seventies.

 

The databases to be searched include:

 

PubMed

 

CINAHL

 

Embase

 

Proquest Health & Medicine Complete

 

ISI Web of Science

 

The search for unpublished studies and Grey literature will include:

 

ProQuest Dissertations and Theses

 

Clinicaltrials.gov

 

Google scholar

 

PROSPERO

 

Initial keywords to be used will be:

 

Breast Cancer or Neoplasm

 

Oral anticancer agents

 

Oral anticancer medications

 

Oral anticancer drugs

 

Adherence

 

Compliance

 

Non-Adherence

 

Non-Compliance

 

Persistence

 

Non-persistence

 

Assessment of methodological quality

Quantitative papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) (Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.

 

Data collection

Quantitative data will be independently extracted from papers included in the review by two reviewers using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI (Appendix II). The data extracted will include study year, study methods, sample sizes and demographics, cancer stage, types of side effects, and adherence and persistence rates. Authors of primary studies will be contacted for missing information or to clarify unclear data.

 

Data synthesis

Quantitative papers,where possible, will be pooled in statistical meta-analysis using JBI-MAStARI. All results will be subject to double data entry. Effect sizes expressed as odds ratio (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for analysis. Heterogeneity will be assessed statistically using the standard Chi-square and also explored using subgroup analyses based on the different quantitative study designs included in this review. Where statistical pooling is not possible the findings will be presented in narrative form including tables and figures to aid in data presentation where appropriate.

 

Conflicts of interest

This author has no conflicts of interest to report.

 

Acknowledgements

This review will contribute to the requirements necessary to earn a Doctorate of Nursing Practice degree from the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Nursing in New Orleans, Louisiana. I would like to gratefully acknowledge the support and assistance of Marsha Bennett, DNS, APRN, ACRN and Mary Marix, MLS, AHIP.

 

References

 

1 International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence Mortality, and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. [Online]. [Context Link]

 

2 American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2014. [Online] Atlanta: American Cancer Society. 2014. [Context Link]

 

3 Porter PL. Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality. Salud Publica de Mexico 2009; 51(suppl 2):S141-S146. [Context Link]

 

4 Cancer Research UK. Breast Cancer Incidence Statistics. [Online]. [Context Link]

 

5 International Agency for Research on Cancer. Latest World Cancer Statistics -Global Cancer Burden to Rise to 14.1 Million New Cases in 2012: Marked Increase in Breast Cancers Must be Addressed. [Online]. [Context Link]

 

6 Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): A population-based study. The Lancet Oncology 2012; 13(8):790-801. [Context Link]

 

7 Yip CH, Smith RA, Anderson BO, Miller AB, Thomas DB, Ang ES. et al. Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries: Overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative Global Summit 2007. Cancer 2008; 113(Suppl 8): 2221-2243. [Context Link]

 

8 Allred DC, Carlson RW, Berry DA, Burstein HJ, Edge SB, Goldstein LJ. et al. NCCN Task Force Report: Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2009; 7(Suppl 6): S1-S21; quiz S22-3. [Context Link]

 

9 US Food and Drug Administration. Hematology/Oncology (Cancer) Approvals & Safety Notifications. [Online], [Context Link]

 

10 Michaud, LB, Choi, S. Oral chemotherapy: A shifting paradigm affecting patient safety. HemOnc Today. [Online] 2008; [Context Link]

 

11 Weingart SN, Brown E, Bach PB, Eng K, Johnson SA. Kuzel TM, et al. NCCN Task Force Report: Oral chemotherapy. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2008; 6(Suppl 3): S1-S14. [Context Link]

 

12 Liu G, Fransen E, Fitch MI, Warner E. Patient preference for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1997; 15(1): 110-115. [Context Link]

 

13 Borner M, Scheithauer W, Twelves C, Maroun J, Wilke H. Answering patients' needs: Oral alternatives to intravenous therapy. Oncologist 2001; 6(Suppl 4): 12-16. [Context Link]

 

14 Catania C, Didier F, Leon ME, Sbanotto A, Mariana L, Nole F, et al. Perception that oral anticancer treatments are less efficacious: Development of a questionnaire to assess the possible prejudices of patients with cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2005; 92(3): 265-272. [Context Link]

 

15 Partridge AH, Avorn J, Want PS, Winer EP. Adherence to therapy with oral antineoplastic agents. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002; 94(9): 652-661. [Context Link]

 

16 World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: Evidence for action.[Online] World Health Organization. 2003. [Context Link]

 

17 Cramer JA, Roy A, Burrell A, Fairchild CJ, Fuldeore M, Ollendorf DA et al. Medication compliance and persistence: Terminology and definition. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 2008; 11(1): 44-47. [Context Link]

 

18 Bonadonna G, Pinuccia V, Moliternia A, Zambetti M, Brambilla C. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 322(14): 901-906. [Context Link]

 

19 Thompson AM, Dewar J, Fahey T, McCowan C. Association of poor adherence to prescribed tamoxifen with risk of death from breast cancer. ASCO Breast Cancer Symposium 2007. Abstract no 130. [Context Link]

 

20 Bedell CH. A changing paradigm for cancer treatment: The advent of new oral chemotherapy agents. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing 2003; 7: 5-9. [Context Link]

 

21 Tannock IF, Boyd NF, DeBoer G, Erlichman C, Fine S, Larocque G, et al. A randomized trial of two dose levels of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1988; 6: 1377-1387. [Context Link]

 

22 Eden OB, Stiller CA, Gerrard MP. Improved survival for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia possible effect of protocol compliance. Pediatric Hematology Oncology 1988; 5: 83-91. [Context Link]

 

23 Mayer RJ, Davis RB, Schiffer CA, Berg DT, Powell BL, Schulman P, et al. Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 331: 896-903. [Context Link]

 

24 Wood WC, Budman DR, Korzun AH, Cooper MR, Younger J, Hart RD, et al. Dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II node-positive breast carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 330: 1253-1259. Erratum published in New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 331:139. [Context Link]

 

25 Swedish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Randomized trial of two versus five years of adjuvant tamoxifen for postmenopausal early stage breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1996; 88: 1543-1549. [Context Link]

 

26 Fink AK, Gurwitz J, Rakowski W, Guadagnoli E, Silliman RA. Patient beliefs and tamoxifen discontinuance in older women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004; 22(16): 3309-3315. [Context Link]

 

27 Lash TL, Fox MP, Westrup JL, Fink AK, Silliman RA. Adherence to tamoxifen over the five-year course. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2006; 99(2): 215-220. [Context Link]

 

28 Puts, MTE, Tu, HA, Tourangeau, A, Howell, D, Fitch, M, Springall, E, et al. Factors influencing adherence to cancer treatment in older adults with cancer: A systematic review. Annals of Oncology 2013; 25(3): 564-577. [Context Link]

 

29 Mathes, T, Antoine, S, Pieper, D, Eikermann, M. Adherence enhancing interventions for oral anticancer agents: A systematic review. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2014; 40(1): 102-108. [Context Link]

 

30 Verbruggher, M, Verhaeghe, S, Lauwaert, K, Beeckmen, D, Van Hecke, A. Determinant and associated factors influencing medication adherence and persistence to oral anticancer drugs: A systematic review. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2013; 39(6): 610-621. [Context Link]

Appendix I

 

MAStARI appraisal instrument[Context Link]

Appendix II

 

MAStARI data extraction instrument[Context Link]

 

Keywords: Breast Cancer; Neoplasm; Oral anticancer agents; Oral anticancer medications; Oral anticancer drugs Adherence; Compliance; Non-Adherence; Non-Compliance; Persistence; Non-persistence