Authors

  1. Kynoch, Kate RN, BN, MN (Intensive Care)
  2. Chang, Anne RN, Dip NEd, BEdSt(Hons), MEdSt, PhD, FRCNA
  3. Coyer, Fiona RN, PhD
  4. McArdle, Annie RN

Abstract

Review question/objective: The quantitative objective is to identify the effectiveness of interventions to meet the needs of families with a relative admitted to an adult ICU. The needs of families of ICU patients will be categorized according to the five areas of family needs identified from an earlier study.1 The five specific areas are:

 

- Assurance

 

- Proximity

 

- Information

 

- Support

 

- Comfort

 

Introduction: This is the protocol for a systematic review which will update a previous systematic review conducted in 2011.1

 

Background: The specialty of intensive care focuses on patients with a variety of life-threatening illnesses or events2, and as a result the ICU is often a very frightening environment for both the patient and family, resulting in feelings of stress, fear, uncertainty, depression and even post-traumatic stress disorder.3-5 Indeed, some family members will have long lasting effects which can impact on the critically ill patient's recovery3 Staff working within this technologically-oriented environment are trained to respond to the changing physiological needs of patients.6 However, it is increasingly recognized that nursing is most effective when directed towards the meeting of specifically identified human needs, rather than concentrating primarily on the patients' medical diagnoses.7 Therefore, understanding and effectively addressing the needs of family members is a necessary step to providing appropriate care.8

 

In a 1979 study, Molter developed the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI) which consisted of 45 needs that family members could rate on the 4-point Likert scales.9 The purpose underpinning the development of this tool was to ascertain the degree of importance attributed to specific needs by family members of critically ill patients.10 These needs identified by families of patients in the ICU have been broadly categorized into five distinct groups; assurance, proximity, information, support and comfort.11 Over the years the CCFNI has been used in many studies across a variety of countries.8,9,11-13

 

The current evidence appears to demonstrate that information about the patient's clinical condition is the greatest universal need, regardless of the relatives' educational background or culture.14-16 During the ICU admission period, communication appears to influence relatives' perceptions of whether their needs are met.17 Patients in intensive care are often too ill to participate in communication and decision making, therefore the patient's family can play an important role in discussions and decisions regarding their care.3 Several studies also highlight the emotional needs of family members with a relative in the ICU.12,16,17 Often the stress experienced by family members during this time can be greater than that of the patient. Hope, reassurance and being able to remain in the vicinity of the patient are crucial.18 For some family members, it is important to know that the patient is receiving the best possible care and is as comfortable as possible.19 Some families feel that the strict visiting hours in some units are very much an obstacle in allowing them to be with their relative.20 Studies have shown that families need to see their critically ill relative often and flexibility with visiting times is also important.4

 

To date the majority of research in this area has focused on identifying relatives' needs in the ICU, their satisfaction with the care and support they receive, how their needs are being met and interventions that may support them during this difficult time. A number of studies have identified factors relating to relatives of critically ill patients in the ICU that can affect their psychological well-being, including uncertainty about the patient's prognosis and technology.21,22 Additionally several literature reviews regarding the impact of critical illness on family members3, and on the needs and experiences of family have been published.16,23 These reviews provide a broad overview of what is currently known about the needs and experiences of family members of patients admitted to an ICU, but not an in-depth analysis and synthesis of the findings. For a holistic approach to care to be realized, it is essential that the critical care nurse is able to identify the specific needs of family members and demonstrate appropriate intervention techniques for those in need of support.24

 

A literature review conducted by Paul and Rattray examining the short- and long-term impact of critical illness on relatives, identified several gaps in the literature concerning families of critically ill patients. Although it is recognized that relatives have specific needs, it is not clear whether these needs are always met and whether further support is required, both during and after the intensive care admission. The studies summarized for this literature review mainly identified relatives' immediate needs using the CCFNI. There were few included studies that investigated interventions to address relatives' needs and the short- and long-term effects of critical illness on relatives.3

 

In 2007, the American College of Critical Care Medicine produced clinical practice guidelines for the support of family in the intensive care unit.15 Their recommendations included shared decision making, regular family conferences to improve communication, cultural and spiritual support, flexible visiting hours and family support from ICU staff.15 However, these published guidelines also identified several weaknesses during the development process including the lack of consultation with patients and families and a lack of high-level evidence for the support of family in the ICU.15 These limitations were again highlighted by McKinley and Elliott when they evaluated the guidelines for their applicability and implications for Australian intensive care units.6

 

A preliminary review of the literature identified a small number of experimental studies that evaluated the effectiveness of providing information to families including the distribution of pamphlets, structured meetings, tailored information and planned telephone calls. The results from these studies were shown to increase relatives' satisfaction, reduce anxiety and improve comprehension of information.8,25,26 The realization that ICU relatives may require more information than is sometimes provided, has led to the development of interventions to empower families such as family information leaflets27 and information websites for ICU patients and relatives.28 More recently, a study conducted by Shaw et al evaluated the effectiveness of a training program for ICU caregivers in communicating with the families of patients in the ICU. The results of the study showed that family satisfaction with their information needs increased significantly with the intervention, as well as staff confidence in communicating with the families.29

 

Since the original systematic review was published in 2011, a number of further studies have been conducted. Therefore an update of the review is required so that new findings are synthesized and included in the recommendations. This will ensure health care organizations, clinicians, researchers and policy makers are provided with the most up-to-date evidence to effectively meet the needs of families with a relative admitted to an adult intensive care unit.

 

Article Content

Inclusion criteria

Types of participants

This review will consider studies that include any family members (including children) of adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Patients with any clinical condition, length of stay or outcome will be included.

 

Participants excluded from this review:

This review will exclude studies of family members of patients in pediatric or neonatal intensive care units.

 

Types of interventions:

This review will consider studies that evaluate any of the following interventions:

 

Assurance

 

- Face-to-face meetings including routine patient care conferences

 

- Family participation in ward rounds

 

Proximity

 

- Open or patient controlled visiting hours

 

Information

 

- Education of nursing staff

 

- Information/education sessions for family

 

- Handouts or brochures

 

- The use of technology e.g. TV, DVD, Phone, SMS or a combination of these

 

Support

 

- Support groups (including social work and psychological support)

 

- Training in coping strategies and stress reduction techniques

 

- Journal/diary writing

 

Comfort

 

- Early family assessment

 

- Development of family care plans

 

- Physical environment (e.g. waiting areas)

 

Types of outcomes

This review will consider studies that include any of the following outcome measures; however outcome measures need to have been evaluated with a validated tool such as the State Trait Anxiety Tool (STAI), or the Hospital Anxiety and Depression tool (HADS):

 

- Coping

 

- Anxiety

 

- Depression

 

- Stress levels

 

- Knowledge/Information comprehension

 

- Reassurance/Support

 

- Satisfaction

 

 

Types of studies

This review will consider both experimental and epidemiological study designs including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, before and after studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies and analytical cross sectional studies for inclusion.

 

Search strategy

The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy will be utilized in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken, followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract and of the index terms used to describe the article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference lists of all identified reports and articles will be searched for additional studies. Only studies published in English will be considered for inclusion in this review. The previous review included articles published between 1980 and June 2010. This updated review will search all available evidence from June 2010 - June 2014.

 

The databases to be searched include:

 

* CINAHL

 

* Pre-CINAHL

 

* PubMed

 

* Health source

 

* psycINFO

 

* psycArticles

 

* Web of science

 

* EMBASE

 

* CENTRAL

 

* DARE.

 

 

The search for unpublished studies, including grey literature will include:

 

* Dissertation abstracts

 

* MEDNAR

 

* Conference Proceedings

 

 

Initial keywords to be used will be:

 

(Mesh heading) intensive care or critical care + ICU or intensive care or critical care or ITU (keywords), (Mesh heading) family + family or relative or family member or loved one or visitors or carer (keywords), (Mesh Heading) information needs + information needs or need or coping or satisfaction or support or reassurance

 

Assessment of methodological quality

Papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) (see Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.

 

Data collection

Data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI (Appendix II). The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives.

 

Data synthesis

Quantitative data will, where possible be pooled in statistical meta-analysis using JBI-MAStARI. All results will be subject to double data entry to minimize errors. Effect sizes expressed as odds ratios (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for analysis. Heterogeneity will be assessed statistically using the standard Chi-square and also explored using subgroup analyses based on the different study designs included in this review. Where statistical pooling is not possible, the findings will be presented in narrative form including tables and figures to aid in data presentation where appropriate.

 

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest is anticipated.

 

References

 

1. Kynoch K, Chang A, Coyer F. Interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review. Australian Critical Care. 2012;25(2):134-5. [Context Link]

 

2. Coyer F, Courtney M, O'Sullivan J. Establishing an action research group to explore family-focused nursing in the intensive care unit. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2007;13:14-23. [Context Link]

 

3. Paul F, Rattray J. Short- and long-term impact of critical illness on relatives: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;62(3):276-92. [Context Link]

 

4. Karlsson, Tisell, Engstrom, Andershed. Family members' satisfaction with a critical care: a pilot study.Nursing in Critical Care. 2011;16(1):11. [Context Link]

 

5. Jones, Backman, Griffith. Intensive care diaries and relatives' symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder after critical illness: A pilot study. American Journal of Critical Care, 2012:172-6. [Context Link]

 

6. McKinley S, Elliott RM. Implications for Australian practice of North American guidelines for the support of the family in patient-centred intensive care. Collegian. 2008;15(1):11-7. [Context Link]

 

7. Stricker KH, Niemann S, Bugnon S, Wurz J, Rohrer O, Rothen HU. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: cross-cultural adaptation of a questionnaire. Journal of Critical Care. 2007;22(3):204-11. [Context Link]

 

8. Chiu Y, Chien W, Lam L. Effectiveness of a needs-based education programme for families with a critically ill relative in an intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2004;13(5):655-6. [Context Link]

 

9. Molter N. Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study. Heart & Lung. 1979;8(2):332-9. [Context Link]

 

10. Molter NC, Leske JS. Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI). Jane S. Leske, PhD, RN, Associate Professor, School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201; 1995. p. 4 p. [Context Link]

 

11. Leske JS. Internal psychometric properties of the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory. Heart & Lung. 1991;20(3):236-44. [Context Link]

 

12. Auerbach SM, Kiesler DJ, Wartella DF, Rausch S, Ward KR, Ivatury R. Optimism, satisfaction with needs met, interpersonal perceptions of the healthcare team, and emotional distress in patients' family members during critical care hospitalization. American Journal of Critical Care. 2005;14(3):202-10. [Context Link]

 

13. Leske JS. Comparison ratings of need importance after critical illness from family members with varied demographic characteristics. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America. 1992;4(4):607-13. [Context Link]

 

14. Fumis RR, Nishimoto IN, Deheinzelin D. Families' interactions with physicians in the intensive care unit: the impact on family's satisfaction. Journal of Critical Care. 2008;23(3):281-6. Epub 2008/08/30. [Context Link]

 

15. Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, Tieszen M, Kon AA, Shepard E, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005. Critical Care Medicine. 2007;35(2):605-22. [Context Link]

 

16. Verhaeghe S, Defloor T, Van Zuuren F, Duijnstee M, Grypdonck M. The needs and experiences of family members of adult patients in an intensive care unit: a review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2005;14(4):501-9. [Context Link]

 

17. Kirchhoff KT, Palzkill J, Kowalkowski J, Mork A, Gretarsdottir E. Preparing families of intensive care patients for withdrawal of life support: a pilot study. American Journal of Critical Care. 2008;17(2):113. [Context Link]

 

18. Verhaeghe STL, van Zuuren FJ, Defloor T, Duijnstee MSH, Grypdonck MHF. How does information influence hope in family members of traumatic coma patients in intensive care unit? Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2007;16(8):1488-97. [Context Link]

 

19. Johnson D, Wilson M, Cavanaugh B, Bryden C, Gudmundson D, Moodley O. Measuring the ability to meet family needs in an intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine. 1998;26(2):266-71. [Context Link]

 

20. Davies JM. Visiting acutely ill patients: a literature review. Intensive Care Nursing. 1987;2(4):163-5. [Context Link]

 

21. Martin-Rodriguez A, Perez San Gregorio M. Psychosocial adaptation in relatives of critically injured patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Spanish Journal of Psychology 2005;8(1):36-44. [Context Link]

 

22. Browning G, Warren NA. Unmet needs of family members in the medical intensive care waiting room. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly. 2006;29(1):86-95. [Context Link]

 

23. Holden J, Harrison L, Johnson M. Families, nurses and intensive care patients: a review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2002;11(2):140-8. [Context Link]

 

24. Burr G. The family and critical care nursing: a brief review of the literature. Australian Critical Care. 1997;10(4):124-7. [Context Link]

 

25. Medland JJ, Ferrans CE. Effectiveness of a structured communication program for family members of patients in an ICU. American Journal of Critical Care. 1998;7(1):24-9. [Context Link]

 

26. Chien W, Chiu YL, Lam L, Ip W. Effects of a needs-based education programme for family carers with a relative in an intensive care unit: a quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2006;43(1):39-50. [Context Link]

 

27. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Jourdain M, Bornstain C, Wernet A, et al. Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 2002;165(4):438-42. [Context Link]

 

28. Ridley S. Loved ones of seriously ill patients need information. British Journal of Nursing. 2004;13(17):1010-. [Context Link]

 

29. Shaw, Davidson, Smilde, Sondoozi, Agan. Multidisciplinary Team Training to Enhance Family Communication in the ICU. Critical Care Medicine. 2014;42(2):265-71. [Context Link]

Appendix I: MAStARI appraisal instruments[Context Link]

Appendix II: MAStARI data extraction instrument[Context Link]

 

Keywords: intensive care; critical care; ICU; ITU family; relative; family member; loved one; visitors; carer information needs; need; coping; satisfaction; support; reassurance