Inclusion criteria
Types of participants
This review will consider studies that include adult patients aged 18 years and over admitted to a critical care unit following cardiac surgery and who received insulin therapy for glycemic control during the acute postoperative phase (five days) of admission.
In this review studies that include participants with a known diagnosis of Diabetic Ketoacidosis will be excluded.
Types of intervention(s)/phenomena of interest
This review will consider studies that evaluate the use of intravenous insulin therapy algorithms to control blood glucose levels in acute postoperative phase patients in critical care environments following cardiac surgery.
In this review, studies will be included if they make one of the following comparisons:
1. Intravenous insulin therapy algorithm compared to another insulin therapy algorithm.
2. Intravenous insulin therapy algorithm compared to no treatment.
3. Intravenous insulin therapy algorithm compared to a placebo.
In this review, studies that include a Glucose-Insulin-Potassium (GIK) infusion as an intervention or a comparator will be excluded.
Types of outcomes
This review will consider studies that include the following outcome measures:
Primary outcome:
* Overall control of blood glucose levels as measured by time to target BGL range, time spent in BGL target range and time above or below target BGL range.
Secondary outcome:
* Incidence of adverse events, including:
- Hypo/hyper glycemia, measured by standard point of care glucometers, arterial blood analysis, or venous blood analysis, with hypoglycemia defined as a BGL reading <3.9mmol/L (70mg/dL)13 and hyperglycemia defined as a BGL reading >7.8mmol/L(140mg/dL).13
- Sternal wound infection, identified by a positive wound culture or a positive wound exudate culture.14
- Mortality rate measured by in-hospital mortality (from day of operation to day of discharge) and/or 30 day mortality.15
Types of studies
This review will consider any experimental study design including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental and before and after studies for inclusion.
Search strategy
The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy will be utilized in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken, followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract and of the index terms used to describe the article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference lists of all identified reports and articles will be hand searched for additional studies.
Studies published in the English language will be considered for inclusion in this review. Databases will be searched with no limits placed on the date of publication, allowing authors to search as far back as possible.
The databases to be searched include:
MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane Trials, Dare, Social Science Index.
The search for unpublished studies will include:
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses and MedNar
Initial keywords to be used will be:
Hyperglycemia/hyperglycaemia
Blood glucose
Cardiac surgery
Heart surgery
Insulin
Insulin infusion
Intensive insulin infusion
Intravenous insulin infusion
Continuous insulin infusion
Postoperative
Critical care environment
Assessment of methodological quality
Papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) (Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.
Data collection
Data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI (Appendix II). The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives.
Data synthesis
Quantitative data will, where possible, be pooled in statistical meta-analysis using JBI-MAStARI. All results will be subject to double data entry. Effect sizes expressed as odds ratios (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for analysis. Heterogeneity will be assessed statistically using the standard Chi-square and also explored using subgroup analyses based on the different study designs included in this review. Where statistical pooling is not possible, the findings will be presented in narrative form including tables and figures to aid in data presentation where appropriate.
Conflicts of interest
No conflicts of interest can be identified or foreseen in relation to this proposed systematic review.
Acknowledgements
Nil
References